Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG OS HSM Sport For Canon EF
Reviews
Show product page
11 years ago
Even though there's a slight drop in sharpness at 200mm, the Sigma delivers excellent overall image quality, making it exceptional value at the price.
Pros:
- Value for money
- Overall performance
- Dual-mode image stabilizer
Cons:
- Slight loss of sharpness at full zoom
- f/2.8 maximum aperture makes it big and heavy
7 years ago
Pleased with this purchase so far
I debated for a while on whether to wait until I could afford the Nikon version or going ahead and getting the Sigma. I have a trip coming up to Alaska so decided to go ahead and give the Sigma a try. I have only had it for a short while but so far I am very pleased with the results from this lens.
15 years ago
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS Lens
Sigma has been producing fast tele zoom lenses for hand-held photography since the late 1980s and, although the new 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS lens claims to be a second generation model, we estimate it's the sixth in a line that reaches back to the original AF 70-210mm f/2.8, which was designed...
11 years ago
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM APO
Pictures are sharp just in the midle at f2.8. (but usable) So. All pictures from http://3foto.ro/sedinta-foto-majorat/ were made at F5.6 with nikon D610 and from http://3foto.ro/sedinta-foto-seniors/ were made at f2.8 to 4.
Pros:
- Good for portraits
- Good OS
- Good colors
Cons:
- Sharp just in the midle at f2.8
19 years ago
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro HSM Review
It's expensive, but not as expensive as similar lenses from the first-party manufacturers. If you want speed, quality and versatility, the chunky Sigma 70-200mm lens is a belter.
Pros:
- Fast constant maximum aperture
- build quality
- AF/MF switching
Cons:
- A focus limiter would be nice
- no macro ratio scale
- no image stabilisation
16 years ago
Excellent for the price
Since I couldn`t afford Nikon version of 70-200mm, I decided to go with Sigma. I did very extensive research and decided it`s worth the money. It`s been over a month, I took maybe thousand pictures with it. I can say this I`m in love with it. It`s a perfect lens for portrait works.
Pros:
- Price
- Bokeh
- Sharpness
Cons:
- Smooth at 200mm
15 years ago
Outstanding performance!
This lens will please the most discriminating photo enthusiast and pros alike. This lens is just as sharp as the canon lens. The constant F2.8 is a big plus too. I can not say one bad thing about this lens it's that good. Buy one you will love it, and love the $$ you saved.
Pros:
- Quality feel
- fast Auto focus and HSM motor
- Tripod collar
- case and Sigma warrantee
Cons:
- None noted
14 years ago
I purchase this Sigma 70-200mm lens as a replacement for my Canon 70-200mm lens without stabilize capabilities. WOW, what a amazing lens, on my first day of purchasing it I went out to back country National park area,I guess I can call it my lucky lens.
13 years ago
Great lens
I wanted a nice F2.8 70-200 lens every since my son was on the wrestling team and the low light of the gym made a lot of my pictures grainy. I did my research and narrowed my choices down to the Canon L series F2.8 70-200 IS II and the Sigma F2.8 70-200 with OS.
Pros:
- Lower cost than Canon lens
- 4 year warranty
- awesome pictures
Cons:
- High cost
13 years ago
Rugged is better than light and cheap!
Lens is a little heavy, but better that cheap, light weight plastic. Lens is used mostly for shooting indoor concerts & sporting events and seems to fast focus very well.
Pros:
- Consistent Output
- Durable
- Easily Interchangeable
- Fast / accurate auto-focus
- Rugged
- Strong Construction
Cons:
- Heavy
4.3
from 37 reviews
5
42.0%
4
42.0%
3
10.0%
2
0.0%
1
3.0%
