TP-Link TL-WN823N
Reviews
Show product page
12 years ago
Excellent value, Great performance
I was using the 150Mbps Wireless N USB Adapter TL-WN721N, and decided to change to the 300Mbps Mini Wireless N USB Adapter TL-WN823N, to my amazement the transfer rate was so much better, From 72Mbps to 130 Mbps, Images below
Pros:
- ,
11 years ago
TP-Link 300Mbps TL-WN823N Mini-Wrlss N USB Adapter
Fantastic performance. I have 5 desktop computers and 4 of them are wireless. The TP-Link 300Mbps Mini Wireless-N USB Adapter is second to none. Fantastic performance in such small form factor.
11 years ago
Works well
I'm not sure if its actually 300mbits, its not quite that fast, I don't believe, but its nice and quick. FYI: Windows 7 does not find the drivers, must use CD.
11 years ago
works great
Inexpensive and functional, what more can you ask I have extremely high speed internet and my wifi router is in a separate room. Still, have downloads at 2500 KBPS. not bad
11 years ago
TP-Link USB ADAPTER 300 MBPS NANO TL-WN823N
Best product and timely delivery. The product is working well and it meets all it's specs.
11 years ago
1 64bit) is great too. It also looks very discrete so its ...
Performs as I'd iexpect for the price, I can manage around 60mbps down/up on my ASUS RT-AC68U. I mainly bought it as a failover for university where my previous adapter kept dropping out, this had no such problems. The plug and play installation (tested on Windows8.1 64bit) is great too.
10 years ago
Small, Fast, Reliable
The TP-LINK mini adapter has proven to be fast and reliable so far. With it and a new router, our download speed went from 2.5 MHz to 11 MHz on average. And, I can plug other devices into the USB drive next to the one the TP-LINK is in, unlike with other bulkier wireless antennas.
9 years ago
Worked for 18 months
It just overheated and died. It was great until then. There are cheaper mini USB Adapter which will work as good and probably last longer.
8 years ago
TP-LINK TL-WN823N USB Wireless Adapter - N300, Single-band
Pros:
- Weren't any
Cons:
- Kept needing to be reinstalled
- Not good
4.5
from 26 reviews
5
72.0%
4
16.0%
3
4.0%
2
0.0%
1
8.0%