I am a very amateur photographer with an interest in dark sky/astrophotography. My daughter has the A6000 and I stepped up to the A6300. She loved the A6000, but it missed a couple of features that I was looking for: 1) Rapid shooting (not for astro); 2) silent mode (no shutter...

The camera is clearly a great quality camera for the money. But it's not the easiest to use. Especially coming over from your standard DSLR (canon or Nikon). I don't care for the dial by the screen. But it gives you some great quality shots. Just not as easy to adjust on the fly.

I have had three Sony cameras and all have failed. I initially had a Sony Alpha 55 which failed after 12 months. Sony's service was subpar and after quite a while I finally got it back and it is still used by my daughter.

I had the a6000 for a year, got it with 18-55 and 55-250mm kit lenses for 699.00. Sold it as I was miserable. On paper, the a6000/6300 have great specs and functionality. A compact body, smaller than many m43 but w/aps-c sensor. Why did I hate Sony: 1. The lenses.

.hgjyghyyttffddxxvnjjiiioio

amazing camera! I am using this with a sigma mc-11 and sigma 18-35(EF mount) and I am super impressed! amazing quality and it is a very solid built camera that feels great 10/10 would recommended for all filmmakers!

takes professional quality photos

I moved all my landscape shooting to mirrorless cameras several years ago. Cameras are just tools and I use the best tool for my jobs, which is why I continued with my Canon 1DX and big glass for all my action and wildlife shots.

Superb Af Performance

Limited By Consumer Body

By seeing many good reviews I bought Sony a6000 before couple of months. I use to do landscape photography.

na

na

Super fast auto focus allows run and gun photography not possible before on mirrorless cameras. Stunning 4k video and 120fps at 1080p.

Easy to Use; Fast Shutter Speed; Large Clear LCD; Small / Compact

Poor Image Stabilization; Short Battery Life